Q: Toto, it was a surprising result. How did it all come about? Lewis looked a sure winner, only to end up in P3…
Toto Wolff: We simply got the calculation wrong. We thought that we would have a bigger gap – a couple of seconds more – but we didn’t.
TW: No, it was a team decision. We are all together in this. We make decisions together. We win and lose together.
Q: How much did the fact it was a virtual safety car, but turned into a real safety car, confuse the calculations of the engineers?
TW: In Monaco you don’t have a GPS – and that makes everything more difficult. That’s why we got it wrong when it switched from the virtual safety car into the safety car.
Q: At what point after Max Verstappen’s accident was the message passed to Lewis to come in?
TW: In Rascasse. The final decision was made 50 metres before the pit lane entry.
TW: We have to check what speed the safety car was doing. But yes he closed up with the safety car and lost time.
Q: When you saw all that wouldn’t it have been common sense to not call him in? Do you really rely only on data?
TW: We we’re in a situation of waging common sense against data. Common sense is okay, but it doesn’t win races in the long run. You have to rely on data – and now we have to find out why we got it wrong today.
Q: Why take that gamble to call him in when real information was so limited? Lewis had a sound lead on track, so why bring him in?
TW: The potential risk could have been Sebastian (Vettel) switching to supersoft tyres and coming up behind Nico. Now in hindsight I have to confess that the data was wrong.
TW: …no he would have been in P3…
Q: …behind Nico! So why was there fear for Lewis’s position?
TW: That is probably the common sense I was talking about – even if you run new supersofts in P3 it is very difficult to overtake one car, let alone two! Probably the result would have been a one and three for us – with a different order. Very likely it would have ended in that way.
Q: Why didn’t you wait with calling Lewis in after you saw Sebastian’s strategy?
TW: Because he was behind us. He was some 13 seconds behind us.
Q: Did Lewis question on the radio the decision to come in?
TW: We talked about it. There was the information that the temperatures dropped and that there was no grip any more on the prime tyres – but that was not the real reason why we called him in. The numbers just added up.
Q: What active role in all this mess did Lewis play? You just mentioned the tyre temperature and the loss of grip…
TW: We made the decision together. You make such a call within a fraction of a second. We tried to get as much input on the situation as possible – from the engineers, from the management and from the driver – and then took a decision. In that case the algorithm was wrong.
TW: I have apologised. This one clearly goes on the team. Lewis is a great driver and I am sure he will understand that it is human nature that errors are made sometimes. That’s it.
Q: What were Lewis’s first words to you?
TW: He was in the media scrum when I apologised and from his look I could see that everything was okay between us.
Q: How do you think Lewis will cope with all this?
TW: He has such a mental strength and is on a roll. Yes, it must be very sore to lose that race win because it was his to win. But I have no doubt that he will recover as quickly as he always did.
TW: I have already enough problems – no need for that! We briefly discussed what we would do if Lewis passed Sebastian, and very likely we would not have interfered.
Q: Some wondered if that was a convenient outcome given the fact that [Mercedes-Benz head] Dr. Dieter Zetsche was here and probably would have wanted a German winner?
TW: Dr. Zetsche was very unhappy with that particular situation. Believe me there is no such thing as favouritism in this team, for any reason.